AI / DS readers first
Start with real-world variability, ovulation timing, label differences, and the structure of self-tracked data before you jump to model papers.
Literature Map
This is not a flat reading list. It is a reading map: start from your background, read the minimum set first, and understand why each paper matters before you expand.
Start with real-world variability, ovulation timing, label differences, and the structure of self-tracked data before you jump to model papers.
Start with task framing, wearable sensing papers, and evaluation design so you can see what the AI literature is actually formalizing.
Start with real-world variability, app-accuracy papers, and wearable evidence to understand product boundaries before model detail.
| Paper | Who should read it first | Why it matters | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilcox et al. 2000 | Everyone | Explains why ovulation is not reliably tied to the midpoint. | PubMed |
| Bull et al. 2019 | App / AI | Shows real-world cycle-length and variability distributions. | PubMed |
| Li et al. 2020 | AI / medical | Shows heterogeneity in large-scale self-tracked data. | PubMed |
| Su et al. 2017 | Medical / AI | Quickest route to understanding ovulation detection methods and their limits as reference labels. | PubMed |
| Goodale et al. 2019 | App / AI / medical | Shows how multimodal wearable evidence is assembled in practice. | PubMed |
| Year | Paper | Reading purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Baird DD. The timing of the fertile window in the menstrual cycle. | Understand why midpoint heuristics fail. |
| 2016 | Moglia ML, Nguyen HV, Chyjek K, et al. Evaluation of Smartphone Menstrual Cycle Tracking Applications. | Understand the gap between app claims and evidence. |
| 2019 | Bull JR, Rowland SP, Berglund Scherwitzl E, et al. Real-world menstrual cycle characteristics of more than 600,000 menstrual cycles. | Understand real-world distribution and large-cohort variability. |
| 2020 | Li K, Urteaga I, Wiggins CH, et al. Characterizing physiological and symptomatic variation in menstrual cycles using self-tracked mobile-health data. | Understand heterogeneity in self-tracked data. |
| Year | Paper | Reading purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Su HW, Yi YC, Wei TY, Chang TC, Cheng CM. Detection of ovulation, a review of currently available methods. | Understand why ovulation detection methods do not form one clean ground truth. |
| 2021 | ASRM / SREI committee opinion on luteal phase deficiency. | Understand that even clinical labels may remain contested. |
| 2025 | Rosen Vollmar AK, Mahalingaiah S, Jukic AM. The Menstrual Cycle as a Vital Sign: a comprehensive review. | Re-anchor the area in recent medical framing. |
| Year | Paper | Reading purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Shilaih M, Degroote L, Falco L, et al. Modern fertility awareness methods: wrist wearables capture temperature changes associated with the menstrual cycle. | Understand why wrist temperature entered the field. |
| 2019 | Goodale BM, Shilaih M, Falco L, et al. Wearable Sensors Reveal Menses-Driven Changes in Physiology and Enable Prediction of the Fertile Window. | Understand the multimodal wearable evidence chain. |
| 2019 | Maijala A, Kinnunen H, Koskimäki H, et al. Nocturnal finger skin temperature in menstrual cycle tracking. | Understand ring-based distal temperature value and limits. |
| 2024 | Jasinski SR, Presby DM, Grosicki GJ, et al. A novel method for quantifying fluctuations in wearable derived daily cardiovascular parameters across the menstrual cycle. | Understand recent work on wearable cardiovascular fluctuation quantification. |
| Year | Paper | Reading purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Li K, Urteaga I, Wiggins CH, Elhadad N. A predictive model for next cycle start date that accounts for adherence in menstrual self-tracking. | Understand why user behavior and biological behavior should not be conflated. |
| 2022 | Symul L, Holmes S. Labeling Self-Tracked Menstrual Health Records With Hidden Semi-Markov Models. | Understand how latent-state models handle noisy self-tracked records. |
| 2025 | Luo C, Su YF, Ren YY, et al. Prediction of the fertile window and menstruation with a wearable device via machine-learning algorithms. | Understand how recent wearable + ML results should be interpreted cautiously. |